The Nigeria’s Attorney General of the Federation, AGF,
Mohammed Adoke, has opened up on why the Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Aminu Tambuwal, is no longer entitled to security details.
According to Adoke, Tambuwal had ceased to be a member of the
House and its Speaker having defected from the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, which
in 2011 sponsored his election into the House of Representatives, to the All
Progressives Congress, APC.
The Attorney General maintained that Tambuwal had now
become an ordinary citizen, who was no longer entitled to the privileges
attached to the office of the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
The explanation is being canvassed by both the Inspector-General
of Police, Suleiman Abba, and Adoke in a joint counter-affidavit
which they filed before Justice Ahmed Mohammed of the Federal High Court,
Abuja, in response to the suit by Tambuwal and the APC.
Read part of the affidavit here…
“The 1st plaintiff (Tambuwal) vacated his seat in the House
of Representatives as a member of that House, when he became a member of the 2nd
plaintiff (All Progressives Congress) in October 2014, having been elected in
2011 on the platform of the 1st defendant (PDP).
“The seat of the 1st plaintiff in the House of
Representatives became automatically vacant by virtue of his defection to the
2nd plaintiff (APC) and consequently ceased to be the Speaker of the 3rd
defendant (the House of Representatives).
“The first plaintiff is not constitutionally entitled to
security details and as such, the 5th defendant did not contravene any law by
its withdrawal of the 1st plaintiff’s security details. The withdrawal of the
security details of the 1st plaintiff was necessitated by the fact the he had
vacated his office as a member of the House of Representatives and consequently
ceased to be the Speaker of the 3rd defendant.
“The 1st plaintiff is no longer a member of the House of
Representatives and as such not entitled to any right or privilege attached to
the office of the Speaker of the 3rd defendant.
That, the 1st plaintiff, as an ordinary citizen of Nigeria,
was not exposed to any danger of bodily harm because of the withdrawal of his
security details,” the counter affidavit which was deposed to on behalf of
the AGF and IGP by one of their lawyers, Nnamdi Ekwem, read in part.
No comments:
Post a Comment